As another relatively newish member I have to agree with earlier sentiment, that this is unproductive and in general, a wee bit undignified. (That's Scottish for "little bit" by the way.)
Should there be a consensus that an "award" is useful, based on whatever criteria, to propel the forum forward, then by all means use a sensible approach to initiate it. Personally, I don't see the need and I think sp was a bit embarrassed at being suggested, even though I do see him as a worthy recipient. This constant cycle of going back to bash an ex-agitator is valueless, possibly even self-destructive, and for newbies, simply confusing.
(Although, I do at least now understand the basic story behind this apparent paranoia. I along with about 6 others have recently been suspected of being an interloper using an alias.)
Would the real Sam Salim please step forward?
I think George had good intentions with his original proposal but probably was a bit carried away with his own creativity. He has acknowledged that and I accept his retraction. Nothing more to see here. Let's move along toward healthy discussion.
About the suggestion that David Livingston get the award posthumously, I'd be prepared to journey over and accept it on his behalf as a relative. The ceremony should be held at Adil's I think.