0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Davegrc on August 14, 2014, 05:49 PMThis site being British based is like having to correspond to my English teacher ;D ;D
Quote from: Phil [Chaa006] on August 14, 2014, 06:07 PMQuote from: Davegrc on August 14, 2014, 05:49 PMThis site being British based is like having to correspond to my English teacher ;D ;DCorrespond with, not correspond to. The two meanings of "correspond" are completely different. 3/10, see me.
Quote from: noble ox on August 14, 2014, 06:52 PMWhy is it some recipes and chefs say "Add salt to taste" does that mean you cant taste anything at all without salt, or does it mean to taste the salt. Add salt to make it salty would make sense very confusing
Quote from: Secret Santa on August 14, 2014, 07:57 PMIt actually works both ways Phil. Correspond to as in compares to means, in this context, that he needs to compare to or match the skills of his English teacher - although the meaning is implicit.
Quote from: Phil [Chaa006] on August 14, 2014, 10:26 PMQuote from: Secret Santa on August 14, 2014, 07:57 PMIt actually works both ways Phil. Correspond to as in compares to means, in this context, that he needs to compare to or match the skills of his English teacher - although the meaning is implicit.A computer program could arguably be forgiven for believing that "This site being British based is like having to correspond to my English teacher" is good idiomatic English; a sentient human being, on the other hand, should see without any doubt that "correspond with" is what was intended.** Phil.
Quote from: Secret Santa on August 14, 2014, 11:24 PMIt may read awkwardly and be idiomatically strangled