QuoteAz told me that a slow cooked curry will always taste better than one cooked fast. So it seems it's not the level of heat but the amount of cooking which counts. Ie, low & slow cooking is as valid as hard & fast.
Does anyone know if Asian chefs/homecooks, use the same method of cooking when at home?
I've tried 2 x slow fry of the spices today, on low heat 12-15mins frying... the results being very poor. When the gravy hit the pan(no tomato paste used), it it sounded like a batch of wet chips hitting the deep fat fryer, very loud

I'll try another couple of slow fry's then I'm going to abandon this method. It's far too early for me to rule it out completely & I'd love to find it can be done this way
Ignoring the pre cooked meats & pastes for a second, a homestyle curry is really only missing the base gravy, frequently replaced by tomatoes & water & a commercial cooking appliance . If the method / process of frying spices is commonplace/second nature, as old as the hills as has been suggested, then where does the fused spice taste disappear to in the homestyle version

I've had homestyle in a Pakistani home ,cooking all day, meat on the bone, falling apart, great yes, bir no
@Gary - thats pretty much the way I've been going. I rarely add meat to a dish if it doesn't taste right after the gravy is cooked out, therefore can get through quite a bit of base gravy.
When I'm down to my last gravy portion, and it doesn't hit the mark, I'll dilute it a little with water & repeat the whole process again. I've got some great results by doing this, but as Roy Walker from Catchphrase used to say "it's good, but it's not right"
Just a thought...looking now at the ready meal supermarket versions, the makers of which should be set up more than anyone to do bir, this little process looks more like one of the reasons they can't produce bir ready meals on a grand scale

ELW