I just came across a very true comment in the introduction to a Delia Smith book.

I agree with the two main points:
1. Delia's recipes do tend to produce good results
2. Other recipes might not.
How can this be? Are most other authors no better than con artists?
I'm afraid to say it may apply to many of the recipes 'published' here, as well.
I suggest we need some kind of 'peer group review' before any recipe is allowed to be posted here, perhaps with a graphic stamp as being 'tried and tested'. The implication might be that many/most other recipes are only to be tried at your own risk.