Hi Axe,
For the same reasons Ray, I find it strange that they would do this. But it seems to sit with my experiences. I know foods like Naan and even Bhaji can be upset being confined to a take-away packet, but curry dishes in the main should be okay.
Certainly the starters do not travel well and as you say, curry should be fine, but it quite often isn't? The only thing I can think of is, It may continue cooking in the foil container, just a little too much?
The thing is, how complicated would it be to have two separate recipes for the same dish? Ok, the base would/could go along way in altering the flavour of the dish but even this would have to be completely different to have any noticeable taste difference.
For example, one base would have to be the usual, onion, carrot, peppers spices, maybe tomatoes. The 2nd base would have all them ingredients plus, a load of whole spices too (in theory) to have a noticeable difference!
Then when cooking the main dishes, the chef would have to be very competent to be able to create two different dishes of the same name, ensuring the TA version is intentionally not as good as the restaurant version. Unless the TA food is cooked by a different chef/cook who may not be of the standard of the restaurant chef? Even so, I just can't understand why they would do this. The TA is probably the first dish that a punter will taste. If this is of a very high standard, then it stands to reason that, the same punter will give the restaurant a go, and probably bring guest's along too.
Dya see where I'm coming from?
I don't think it is about profit margins either. Most restaurants charge higher when you sit in, than when you take out, obviously to cover their overheads. The portions are usually smaller in the restaurant too. So, why would they absorb their profit margins in the restaurant by using more expensive ingredients?
I dunno mate, it's an interesting one, and not something that I've come across before.
Ray
