Naresh
Thank you for your suggestions. I find your comments very interesting and potentially one of the best contributions here for some time.
Here are some of my thoughts, in response:
>It seems to have become a game and not reality as it
>seemed to be even a month ago.
Recent events may have rocked the boat a bit but I'm sure we will soon stabilise and get back on track. I'm sure we're serious about making progress and cracking all the main recipes, complete with their BIR taste but, as I've suggested before, we are not as well organised or methodical as an effective team or organisation, which often have a coodinator or manager.
>Let me say, quoting a statement from suggestions for improving
>this site...What's all that about?"
We're not all journalists and our sentence construction, clear writing and other aspects of English grammar may leave a bit to be desired. I hope I write OK but as I achieved nowhere near grade A for English at O level, who am I to say!
>The chef's would not do it. They might laugh.
I suspect you are correct for many chefs, but a few might and do oblige.
>What you are suggesting is mix and match methods.
>That is just absolutely mince
I reckon you are correct, like Andy suggested, that you can't simply mix and match bases because each base is designed by each individual BIR to go with their specific curry recipes.
>What you need to do is go to your local bir or take-away
>and order a medium curry, be it chicken, lamb or prawn.
>This should be your starting point. Very little added to
>the base sauce. If you can emulate that dish, you are
>90% there to being totally accurate. Then move on to
>other dishes. You cannot work in reverse.
Good advice. Many thanks.
>As regard to the bases on here:
>Poppadom Petes is very close to a true standard base
>but there are discrepencies on the quantities and
>methods but the basics are there. Needs attention.
Can you please help suggest specific improvements to Pete's recipe, so it is even better.
>Finally get rid of all the meaningless posts from the forum.
>It's too long winded ploughing through the crap.
I agree, as suggested in a recent post I made on 'suggestions'.
Regards
George