Topic: CH lockdown rant

[Ghoulie]

So - I'll post this in this section - the relevance of which titlewise seems to have escaped CH.

As a mod & supermod elsewhere, I fail to see the reason for the rant from CH.   There is a section here for people to discuss matters non curry related - yet you seem to object to non curry related chat in your rant - sounding just like a clone of CA.   Are you in the right forum CH?

Chill out pal - or move on.

[Naga]

The forum has calmed down again after the recent nonsense, so why stir the pot again? As far as I can see, CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016. Let sleeping dogs lie and get on with the main focus of the forum.

[Ghoulie]

Maybe CH has chilled out.  I certainly hope so - or been taken to task?

Either way - let's hope lessons have truly been learned and there are no future flare ups.  There should be no reason for your apt description Naga of such 'nonsense.

[George]

The forum has calmed down again after the recent nonsense, so why stir the pot again? As far as I can see, CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016. Let sleeping dogs lie and get on with the main focus of the forum.

Do you mean: "The forum has calmed down again" because "CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016".

If so, I think you are probably correct.

[Naga]

Do you mean: "The forum has calmed down again" because "CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016".

If so, I think you are probably correct.

No. I don't mean that. and I'll thank you kindly not to put words in my mouth.

[Peripatetic Phil]

Do you mean: "The forum has calmed down again" because "CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016"

No. I don't mean that. and I'll thank you kindly not to put words in my mouth.

I think, Naga, and with the greatest respect, that even though you clearly did not intend to say what George erroneously inferred, there is nonetheless a clear causal relationship between the absence of CH from this forum and the harmonious atmosphere that currently obtains.  Long may the latter continue.

** Phil.

[George]

Do you mean: "The forum has calmed down again" because "CH hasn't signed on since 06/03/2016"

No. I don't mean that. and I'll thank you kindly not to put words in my mouth.

I think, Naga, and with the greatest respect, that even though you clearly did not intend to say what George erroneously inferred, there is nonetheless a clear causal relationship between the absence of CH from this forum and the harmonious atmosphere that currently obtains.  Long may the latter continue.

I agree but would go a bit further by suggesting it's what Naga WAS thinking but he's not prepared to admit it, just like nobody will admit telling the Sun newspaper what the Queen said in support of the UK leaving the EU.

[Peripatetic Phil]

I agree but would go a bit further by suggesting it's what Naga WAS thinking but he's not prepared to admit it ...

But that sort of assertion, George (and also with the greatest respect) is not really helping to perpetuate the current harmonious atmosphere, is it ?   It is surely the sort of thing that one might reasonably think but which is better left unsaid, is it not ?

** Phil.