There are times, George, when I think that you missed your true vocation. Do you not think that you would have excelled as an agent provocateur ?
What do you disagree with in my post #155 (detailed points or even my right to attempt to defend myself against mob bullying)?
I did not have any particular post in mind when I made my observation, George, and I cannot see that it would be helpful for me to re-examine #155 to see if it applies; I simply feel that there are times (rather too many times, in fact) when you post simply in order to be provocative (I believe you have admitted this in the past) and it was in reference to such actions that my post referred.
And why didn't you use your arguments against Gav's post #150?
As above, I had no particular post in mind, so examining Gav's #150 to see if it is equally applicable there is unnecessary -- I am referring to your posts in general, not any specific one, and I do not think that Gav makes a habit of being provocative.
BUT, as you will know in your r