....... and on what basis do we trust it? Has to be said Phil, as a relatively new member, I would have more faith in a similar feedback from yourself or another 'trusted' member. The whole thing smells worse as time goes on.
On the most fundamental basis of all, Ruby : in this country, a man is innocent until he is proven guilty. Not only has Ken not been found guilty, he has not even appeared in court. All accusations levelled against him are superficial : "he's a new member, so he doesn't deserve our trust". Well, I trust him. If I am wrong in my trust, so be it, but I would far sooner be guilty of trusting someone untrustworthy than of failing to trust someone who is completely deserving of trust.
Here are Ken's stats :
Posts:
45 (0.057 per day)
Gender:
Male
Age:
56
Location:
Sheffield via Sarf London
Date Registered:
23 January 2011, 16:56:09
Local Time:
22 March 2013, 18:50:13
Language:
English British
Last Active:
Today at 17:36:33
and here are Chris's :
Posts:
515 (1.651 per day)
Gender:
Male
Age:
45
Location:
Burnley
Date Registered:
14 May 2012, 14:17:18
Local Time:
22 March 2013, 18:51:39
Language:
English British
Last Active:
Today at 15:44:48
I see no correlation whatsoever.
** Phil.