Quote from: George on November 30, 2011, 09:32 AM
Isn't it possible to change an agreement, promise or whatever, if it's by agreement with all the main parties? I would still follow a policy of minimal moderation. I know it will be more controversial than sticking only to the deletion of pure spam. I'm pleased that hotstuff and ifindforu, at least, have indicated support. Do you really prefer to leave all the rude words and insults in place on this thread? Incidentally, I can never see the sense in closing a thread, on any forum, just because the topic is of too much interest; too successful almost.
I know it's totally off topic but, in my opinion, the question should be split into two parts:
1. Does the forum need better moderation (and administration)?
Yes, definitely. Not just for deleting spam, and not just for deleting or editing personal insults (or locking unproductive threads), but also in terms of mainting good housekeeping (i.e. ensuring that new threads are posted in the correct forum sections and that threads remain on topic) which is now a mess and getting worse by the day.
2. Are you, George, appropriate for the role of a moderator?
No, definitely not.
I took some time to post what I consider to be the responsibilities and attributes of a moderator, which I still stand by, here:
https://curry-recipes.co.uk/curry/index.php?topic=5208.0And you, George, should still stand by your PROMISE to only delete spam (and not look for a creep in responsibilities).
Admin should seek moderators who appropriately fulfill the role. I can think of a few who I would heartily recommend..and you are not amongst them, I'm afraid.