There are 2 distinct lines of thought on this topic.
I'm a firm believer in the notion that a recipe such as Base Gravy is very easily reproduced with no loss of character in a scaled down version. I think Phil and George are of similar opinion.
I know Pete / Haldi and others are firmly of the opinion that in order to achieve the full benefit, the base gravy must be cooked in a large volume as is done commercially.
I was just reading over the recovered Old Archived posts of Andy2295 and I came across his original recipe for base gravy. A few things strike me as worth looking into particularly from this introductory paragraph. The recipe is here
]https://curry-recipes.co.uk/curry/index.php?topic=1476.0]Quote Andy2295.
"As the chefs have an eye for visual measurement using their cooking spoon, we decided to weigh out all of the separate ingredients one evening while we made up a batch of base sauce/gravy. Please do NOT try to half the recipe amounts listed here as the results are not the same. We tried it! By all means proportion out to get a reduced stock but pure halving of ingredients is no good."
Firstly he says they decided to weigh everything out, but then straight out refused to accept multiple lines of questioning regarding a weighed amount of onions. What he has provided are mostly volumetric quantities and as anyone would know when dealing with spherical objects of different sizes and packing arrangement into different sized pots, the actual mass of the combined amount can be widely variable. At least he does stipulate the pot size. CA eventually provides information that it is approximately 4.5 kg.
The main point is his insistence on making the full amount. He says NOT to half it, but then says by all means proportion it out for a reduced amount. This went unquestioned for the whole thread and in the whole 16 pages only George alluded to quantity of scale. (At one point Andy's rebuke was quite abrupt.) I have no idea how halving or quartering the quantity is anything other than proportioning down. (Or dividing by 9 as I would). To do otherwise is an un-proportional adjustment. I see no ingredients listed that would cause any significant problem with direct linear scaling. He goes on later in the thread to answer George's questions about the size of his pots to say that it could be increased into a bigger pot but they do it in the 7.5 litre pots for business model and cold storage reasons. If it would be OK to scale upwards into a bigger pot, why is it not so to scale down into smaller ones? Perhaps scaling upwards would not be linear but he doesn't mention this.