Certainly not Naga. I am just surprised that within a forum such as this, the normal membership level contributor even has the ability to implement a formal Forum Poll, obviously using a function designed to do it.

I am also astonished that a member would take it upon themselves to initiate such a blatant attack on the appointed moderator. ( Now reposted in 2 forms - resignation and sacking))

This is not to say that I agree with all that George has done or not. I don't agree with all that other members have done either, I am simply discussing the methods and levels used in this whole sorry situation.

Quote from: Micky Tikka on April 09, 2015, 11:42 PM
Livo
Stop being a poof
Your obviously related to georgie

One more gin 

Ouch, Now I'm really hurt by that.   Some of my good friends are of the other persuasion, but I'm afraid your wrong about me on both counts.

All I'm saying is this. I am a member of several other internet forums and I'm trying to imagine this type of vendetta against a moderator on any of the others and what would happen.  I can probably quite safely say that it would not be the moderator who ended up on the outside.

Yes, I knew that MT. 

I'm not worried about who is or isn't a nice chap, an absolute point head, or a good or bad mod.  It is the approach and methods being used that I call into question.  To any outsider, newcomer or one of the many members who remain in the background, it must be a very poor look.  This is tantamount to airing ones soiled linens in public.  It's just not a good look in my opinion.

Replied in the "polls?" thread. More relevant over there.

He had been unwell recently and was looking very aged.  I love the 12th man versions of Sir Richie. So unPC but I can't help laughing my heart out.

Another sad day for cricket, eh what!