Quote from: George on March 31, 2015, 11:29 AM
I've tidied up the sentence construction in your post quoted above so it makes a bit more sense. Is your thinking any clearer and more logical than the way you write?

I would respectfully suggest, George, that it might be helpful if you were to set a good example to others by not making a tacit /ad hominem/ attack in a reply to another member.  By all means write something along the lines of "It wasn't entirely clear to me what you meant in your message, but I have assumed that you probably intended to write something along the lines of the following ...", but a question such as "Is your thinking any clearer and more logical than the way you write?" is clearly not an appropriate question for any member to pose, let alone a moderator who should know better and who be setting an example to us all.

You are, after all, the senior moderator on this forum and have been in post for a considerable period of time; if you were to set a good example to others, then they would surely be encouraged to be similarly respectful in their own replies.

** Phil.

Quote from: littlechilie on March 31, 2015, 10:56 AM
If the were to ever be a third mod, it would need to be an outside influence, certainly not yourself SS! That's why I voted for No.

Let's hope you wouldn't be in the running either then LC as your selective reading leaves a lot to be desired for the role.

In particular:

Quote from: Secret Santa on March 30, 2015, 01:04 PM

Quote from: Phil [Chaa006] on March 30, 2015, 12:54 PMWould you be willing to stand as third co-moderator, Santa ?

No. I'd have to behave then!  ;D

Pretty much gives the game away doesn't it LC...to anyone who's wise enough to read before making an ass of themselves that is.

And if that were not enough, to repeat Phil's comment, to vote no on the basis of one candidate you don't want as moderator (who in fact was never a candidate anyway) says much for your lack of bias and inability to focus on the crux of the matter.

I think the word Click comes to mind ;D yep Click, and three amigos.

Quote from: Phil [Chaa006] on March 31, 2015, 12:06 PM
I'm afraid you've lost me, Little Chillie.
* Phil.

I believe he means clique Phil!  ;D :

Quote from: Phil [Chaa006] on March 31, 2015, 11:40 AM

Quote from: George on March 31, 2015, 11:29 AM
I've tidied up the sentence construction in your post quoted above so it makes a bit more sense. Is your thinking any clearer and more logical than the way you write?

I would respectfully suggest, George, that it might be helpful if you were to set a good example to others by not making a tacit /ad hominem/ attack in a reply to another member.  By all means write something along the lines of "It wasn't entirely clear to me what you meant in your message, but I have assumed that you probably intended to write something along the lines of the following ...", but a question such as "Is your thinking any clearer and more logical than the way you write?" is clearly not an appropriate question for any member to pose, let alone a moderator who should know better and who be setting an example to us all.

You are, after all, the senior moderator on this forum and have been in post for a considerable period of time; if you were to set a good example to others, then they would surely be encouraged to be similarly respectful in their own replies.

** Phil.

But he won't he can't help himself, he has always been the same. Hence why, I believe, not many on here have any respect for him as a member, let alone a moderator.

Surely you must see that moderators are usually well respected, skilled, contributing, members, with good communication/people skills, within their community.
Which to me George has none of the above.
But you carry on supporting him Phil, for whatever reasons you may have.

Oh and I expect LC meant, Clique. Yes that would be it.