Login with username, password and session length
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I just thought it was out of order to do this on television, unprofessional even ?
Have you ever wondered what goes on in the kitchen of some BIR restaurants or takeaways, when nobody is looking? I dread to think. Would the fear of such a risk put you off going to a BIR that served up delicious food?
I would love to have taken a sample from her ring. I hate to think what may have been around that area
Quote from: prawnsalad on March 04, 2011, 02:30 AMSorry if I missed something here as although I think DS is great I just cant remember her running a BIR? As we aren't taking Steak and Kidney Pie I don't know why anyone bothered to reply to George. My guess is she would screw up the Taz base first go, just like the rest of us.Yes, it certainly looks like you've missed the whole point. It's perfectly valid to come up with a general observation and then suggest it MIGHT apply to the specific case of BIR recipes. In my experience, most (i.e more than half of) books claiming to reveal BIR recipes are a bit of a disappointment, to say the least, and I thought many people here tend to agree. It might be amusing to mention Big Macs and Steak & Kidney pudding but it's totally irrelevant to the main point I'm making.
Sorry if I missed something here as although I think DS is great I just cant remember her running a BIR? As we aren't taking Steak and Kidney Pie I don't know why anyone bothered to reply to George. My guess is she would screw up the Taz base first go, just like the rest of us.
I just came across a very true comment in the introduction to a Delia Smith book.I agree with the two main points:1. Delia's recipes do tend to produce good results2. Other recipes might not.How can this be? Are most other authors no better than con artists?I'm afraid to say it may apply to many of the recipes 'published' here, as well.I suggest we need some kind of 'peer group review' before any recipe is allowed to be posted here, perhaps with a graphic stamp as being 'tried and tested'. The implication might be that many/most other recipes are only to be tried at your own risk.
the position I now occupy is one of zero time for any chef (celebrity or otherwise) who has not actually worked in a public BIR personally, as no matter how good they are at streak & kidney (pie not pudding) they lack any real proof of ever making a true BIR dish even once.
The thing that jumps to my mind is...1) Well she WOULD write this in one of her books, shes selling her books and Image.2) The wording and description sound to good be be true....i,e "what i like about you Delia" "the kind comment was cheerfully whispered" and " by a charming lady who is anything but an idiot" who writes this stuff its like a novel ;DIf i was reading this book i would look at this as total sales hype and ott, i would have put the book down at this point and bought the hairy bikers...not really but you know what i mean.
I just thought it was out of order to do this on television, unprofessional even ?I thought she should have known better. The rings were very large with plenty of places for them...err bugs to hide until washed out via the mixing.
It's going to happen again if we're not careful! RESIST TEMPTATION TO RESPOND TO INSULTS! My thoughts; I post a recipe when I think I can go no further with the development of the dish, when I've explored all possibilities, and ruled out many of the variables. My hope is, members enjoy the dish and give it positive feedback, however, I am not naive enough to think it will suit everybody's tastebuds. Still, I'm confident that most of my own dishes have something which others can build on if they wish.As for providing a "statement of quality" I'm never going to add a recipe to the forum and give it a tag line such as "Better than the BIR's" Yes, I know Blade did with his tikka, and to be fair, it was certainly better than most! I wouldn't be so bold.Now, if anyone came back after trying one of my recipes and said "Razor, sorry mate but your dish was terrible" I would; (a) be safe in the knowledge that they haven't done it correct, as all my dishes are tried and tested on many many family and friends before I post them here; (b) I would check through the instructions and make sure that I haven't made a mistake with the published recipe; (c) I would thank them for trying the recipe but would enquire as to what it was that they didn't like about it.The group tests are a great way of validating some of the recipes kindly provided by the members and I don't think that there is a need for a separate section or an "untrusted" section.I guess if the forum was a tad more disciplined, every recipe provided could be accompanied by a review count for example;Razors Seekh kebab with photos (27 reviews)To validate how good the recipe is, a positive or negative function could be added to the review, worked out by percentage, so the title would now read;Razors Seekh kebab with photos (27 reviews, 98% positive) :Unfortunately, as it stands at the moment, the reviews count would simply mean, number of responses to the recipe, many of which could be off topic!I wonder if the above could be an added function to the forum, Stew?Of course, anybody could still reply or ask questions but if you are reviewing the recipe, you could simply click on the 'positive or negative' option!Whadya think?Ray