I have to say here, that the people using this forum are from different parts of the country, as well as from different parts of the world.
Hi curryqueen
Well first of all I don't care about the opinions of people from other parts of the world, unless of course they have sampled a reasonable amount of curries in standard Indian restaurants from different parts of the UK, or at the very least had a few curries from Indian restaurants in one part of the UK.
I know that sounds nasty, but I don't care. I don't partake in 'the pain of childbirth' forum, for example. The reason? Because I've never experienced the real thing.
But to answer your main point, and I've said it so many times now that I'm even boring myself. No matter where I've had a curry in the UK, they have, irrespective of the actual quality of the curry, had the same smell and underlying taste. It is unique to the indian restaurant curry and it is what I am trying to copy.
I'm still trying to find one of these curry houses that actually do not have the smell and taste I am talking about. I have never been to a restaurant that verges toward 'authentic' Indian cuisine, nor do I have any desire to. Perhaps this is why I have a very definite idea of what the 'smell' and 'taste ' is?
English BIRs seem to cook lets say a madras in the midlands different to that here in the south.
I agree totally. But, in my experience at least, they will have a common smell and taste. One may be hotter, may have more veg, may have a? smoother sauce, may have less oil, may have tomato pieces, may be darker in colour. They still have the same underlying taste and smell.
Now unless in my travels across the country I have just happened, by sheer chance, to pick on the restaurants that conform to my idea of the 'smell' and the 'taste', I have to conclude that the smell and taste that I mean is universal, at least within the UK.