Did it have the "taste" ? Im tempted to try it but im not sure about putting that jelly into my nice fresh pot of gravy.
I do think my currys now have that taste just I can't taste it

I want someone else's opinion.
There is definitely the taste in it.
From three sources we have concluded that the restaurants are certainly making a stock.
I still felt that the curry sauce I bought was a little better.
That really bugs me.
But I consider the use of the stock as the first major step forward for about? six months.
It beats the Bengal Cuisine "help"
I still think the answer to making restaurant curry lies in the base.
If you've got that right, to make a vindaloo, all you would need is precooked ingredients and chilli powder.
You may have "the taste" in your curries because you are cooking with chicken anyhow.
Ironically, the meal I dream to make is a vegetable vindaloo.
The reason why my results have left me disappointed could well be that I never included chicken as an ingredient.
I think one serious problem, when we are lucky enough to talk to chefs, is getting them to understand what we want.
I don't think they would have a clue what we mean by "the taste"
Certainly, when I got this stock recipe, the chef didn't understand the word "stock".
He called it soup.
That's why seeing these things done are so important.
I wish I could figure out a way to see the base done at a restaurant.
You have to be there for hours and you are really in the way.
The kitchens I have been in are really cramped.
If there is a missing ingredient it is something very simple.
Something accidentally forgotten.
I don't believe it is hidden.