Login with username, password and session length
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Imo not the best subject for the forum, it
pill's are handed out like sweets. we could save money their,
I know what you mean Phil, I'm on 7 different pills a day and a nitro spray, But if they had to stop, then so be it, I for one don't mind dyeing, Take life as it comes, Since I give up work in 2006 life has just gone downhill, never had so many things go wrong with me in all my life,
anyway enough of this morbid crap. have a good day Phil, and happy cooking.... ;D
May I say from the bottom of my heart, Les, that I hope that 2019 is your best year yet, and may each year thereafter bring you fresh blessings.** Phil.
Someone might prefer to return to the unanswered perfectly reasonable questions thus far ignored in other threads.
:
Back to this one though, a big question or two come to my mind based on the difficulty you are having over there in getting Brexit to actually happen. Firstly, what chance do you think there is of taking it back to the people?
Secondly, as a consequence should this occur, is the question of the undermining of due political process. I'm no constitutional lawyer but isn't the result of a referendum a binding constitutional obligation? If it is redone in the hope of an out because it's too hard to do, then referendums from now on are nothing more than surveys. The precedent would be set. Is it even legally allowed to go back for second vote?
We recently held a postal vote "referendum" here on the issue of same sex marriage. Not even a proper ballot day voting event at polling places, and not compulsory, as is all other polling down here, but the result was accepted as being the will of the people and consequently our constitution was changed to reflect it. What would that mean for the independent Scotland? What would it do to any future referendum outcomes.