Login with username, password and session length
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Both pictures are for the garam massala,can't give you quantities though as he didn't give us any.
I do hope that between the three of you you can come up with a recipe for the bhuna. From how it's been described it sounds just like the old style which I describe as very savoury and distinctly different in taste from any other savoury curry. Does that sound about right?Again, the description of the CTM also sounds like I used to have it and not the oversweet slop that now passes for CTM.I suppose the stumbling block will be the spiced oil which you didn't get to make.
someone mentioning that your old-style bhuna would generally be on the dried side?)
Any good bhuna recipes so I can try see how the food here differs?
I've never been a big fan of bhuna
And I know many have experienced it that way, but when I used to have old style bhuna it was in a similar amount of sauce as any other curry.
When i was a kid, (and i've mentioned this before) a prawn puri was Prawn pathia and puri starter. The best tasting curry in the restaurant!Sometime during the 80's they changed this to a prawn bhuna and puri which really pissed me off.BUT..... Both dishes had to be dry because they were sitting on top of fried bread.No BIR is going to put a gravy curry on top of bread, it just aint done!An old school bhuna AND pathia should be dry, neither should be full of sauce like they are these days.
If you or anyone else has either dish with gravy, then thats the chef trying to stretch the dish to a main course, and it becomes neither one or the other.
But there I must respectfully disagree : both a bhuna and a pathia were traditionally served as main courses, not as starters (unless, of course, they were served in/on a puri or similar).** Phil.
I never saw a Pathia as a main dish when i was a kid Phil. It was always something really special for me and only came as a starter.