Phil,
Sorry I got my numbers wrong that is the same burner as mine...40kw. It's a beast!
Sorry I got my numbers wrong that is the same burner as mine...40kw. It's a beast!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Quote from: Whandsy on February 12, 2013, 06:12 PM
I don't know if this has been documented anywhere but I pm'ed BB1 when his recipes were 1st posted and the takeaway he works in uses reclaimed bhaji oil
W
Quote from: Secret Santa on February 11, 2013, 08:30 PMQuote from: Martinwhynot on February 11, 2013, 08:24 PM
By my calculations that means that CA's base would work out at 1.458L of oil. I'm speechless...BB1 will be just slightly peeved as the oil content was the factor in all the bleating and whinging.
You continue to ignore the crucial point. Unlike other bases and methods the Glasgow base does not (at least in my experience) release the oil that it contains. So the fact that it may contain slightly less than other bases is moot because it all stays in the finished curry.
? My first photos of the results clearly showed oil at the side of the pan and sitting marbled on top of the curry so I think I did get the point being made. Also oil separates from the base too so giving another opportunity to skim some away. The amount of coconut block used could also be contributing to the greasiness comments some are making.
Quote from: ELW on February 11, 2013, 07:01 PM
When its compared to others available, it doesn't have much spice/GG content....scale down the 5kg to 2.5 & it has less than ca's & slightly less oil :